HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US August 1, 2010
Train Accident
             
 
Selecting a train accident attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

Train Accident Newsroom

 
 

< Back to Previous Page

NTSB Finds, Inadequate Procedures and Safeguards Contributed to Two WMATA Metrorail Accidents Fatal to Wayside Workers

Washington, DC - The National Transportation Safety Board today determined the probable causes of two Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Metrorail accidents that resulted in three employee fatalities, and called on WMATA to tighten rules governing wayside worker safety.

"The safety provisions that are in place are understandably geared to the thousands of the daily Metro commuters," said NTSB Chairman Mark V. Rosenker. "However, we also need to make sure that the same attention to safety is established for employees who service and maintain the track, signals, and railcars for the Metro system."

On Sunday, May 14, 2006, a southbound WMATA Metrorail Red Line subway train struck and killed a Metrorail employee as the train was about to enter the Dupont Circle station in Washington, D. C. The employee was an automatic train control system mechanic who had been working with two other mechanics at the interlocking just north of the Dupont Circle station. All three mechanics had moved between the two main tracks north of the interlocking in order to stay clear of a northbound train that was leaving the station. As the southbound accident train was arriving, the other two mechanics remained in the clear between the two trains as they passed and were not injured. According to signal system data logs, the southbound train was moving about 40 mph as it traveled past the interlocking.

The Safety Board determined that the probable cause of the Dupont Circle accident was the failure of the automatic train control system mechanic to stay clear of the approaching southbound train either because he was not aware of the presence of the train or because he lacked a physical reference by which to identify a safe area outside the train's dynamic envelope.

On Thursday, November 30, 2006, a northbound WMATA Metrorail Yellow Line subway train struck and fatally injured two Metrorail employees who were performing a routine walking inspection of main track near the Eisenhower Avenue Metrorail station in Alexandria, Virginia. The accident occurred as the northbound train was traveling about 35 mph along track normally used for southbound traffic.

The Safety Board determined that the probable cause of the Eisenhower Avenue accident was the failure of the train operator to slow or stop the train until she could be certain that the workers ahead were aware of its approach and had moved to a safe area.

Contributing to both accidents were WMATA Metrorail right-of-way rules and procedures that did not provide adequate safeguards to protect wayside personnel from approaching trains, that did not ensure that train operators were aware of wayside work being performed, and that did not adequately provide for reduced train speeds through work areas. Also contributing to these accidents was the lack of an aggressive program of rule compliance testing and enforcement on the Metrorail system.

In the report released today, the Safety Board noted that in both the Dupont Circle and Eisenhower Avenue accidents, train operators ran their trains as if no workers were present or were likely to be present along their routes. The rules and procedures in effect at the time did not require that trains be operated in manual mode or at reduced speeds through work areas, either of which would have given the train operators a better opportunity to respond if wayside workers failed to move into the clear at the approach of a train.

The Safety Board found that the rules cited in WMATA's Metrorail Safety Rules and Procedures Handbook, did not account for the fact that, depending on the sight distance as shown in both accidents, trains being operated at normal speeds may not be able to stop short of wayside workers who are unaware of the train's approach and have failed to move to a safe area. The rules did permit wayside workers to request that the control center reduce train operating speeds in the areas in which they were working, but as revealed by the Board's investigation, such requests were discouraged by train controllers and seldom made.

The Board determined that technology can provide additional protection for wayside workers, especially in a work environment in which a lapse of attention can quickly result in serious injury or death. There is technology that can provide alerts to both the train operator and the wayside workers, the Board noted. These systems provide train operators with an audible and visual alarm when they are approaching wayside workers who are near the tracks and warnings to wayside workers who are wearing a personal warning device. Therefore the Safety Board believes the WMATA should promptly implement appropriate technology that will automatically alert wayside workers of approaching trains and will automatically alert train operators when approaching areas with workers on or near the tracks.


Contact a Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  Did You Know?
 
Train Accident Lawyer

The causes of train accidents can be grouped into five categories.

A train accident will occur in one of five different ways.  The five main reasons for train accidents are: (1) human factors, (2) track and structures, (3) equipment, (4) signal and train control, and (5) miscellaneous.

The majority of train accidents are caused by human factors or track factors.

During a recent five year study, it has been determined that the great majority of train accidents resulted from human factor causes or track causes.  In addition, in recent years, most of the serious events involving train collisions or derailments resulting in release of hazardous material, or harm to rail passengers, have resulted from human factor or track causes.

Contact a train accident attorney today!

The United States Government enacted the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), in 1908.

Congress passed FELA with the intent to decrease tragic railroad accidents.  In addition, FELA encourages standardization in railroad practices and railroad equipment.


 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Train Accident Law Firms.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.